Can't believe it's been nearly 2 weeks since I posted, and a month since baseball began. Here is a case in which FAMM (Families Against Mandatory Minimums) played an active role, which just shows that not all mandatory minimum sentences relate to drug offenses.
The case is US v. Polouizzi, No. 08-1830 (2d Cir. April 24, 2009) (available thanks to Doc):
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
The link doesn't work. Could you comment on this case? http://www.in.gov/judiciary/opinions/pdf/04300901rdr.pdf
Post a Comment